暴风雪

唐纳山口 I-80 暴雪预警

Streeting backs Burnham for return to Westminster, saying he is Labour’s best chance of winning byelection – UK politics live

Streeting backs Burnham for return to Westminster, saying he is Labour’s best chance of winning byelection – UK politics live


Streeting throws his support behind Burnham for Makerfield byelection

Former health secretary Wes Streeting has voiced his support for Andy Burnham to compete in the Makerfield byelection, describing him as one of Labour’s “best players on the pitch”.

Streeting backs Burnham for return to Westminster, saying he is Labour’s best chance of winning byelection – UK politics live
Wes Streeting leaving 10 Downing Street after a meeting with Keir Starmer on Wednesday. Photograph: Neil Hall/EPA

In a post on X, Streeting, a potential Labour leadership challenger, said:

double quotation markWe need our best players on the pitch. There is no doubt that Andy Burnham is one of them.

The Makerfield byelection will be tough. Votes will need to be earned.

Andy is the best chance of winning and that should override factional advantage or propping up one person.

If successful, Burnham is widely expected to challenge Keir Starmer for the party leadership.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

In other news today, parliament’s intelligence watchdog has criticised the government for redacting documents “far too broadly” in response to MPs’ demands for details on Peter Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador.

PA reports that the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) said today that it had made its final decisions on redactions in 337 documents connected to the appointment on national security grounds.

However, in a statement, the ISC raised “concerns” about wider redactions. This includes individuals’ personal data, email addresses and the identities of junior civil servants.

Peter Mandelson seen outside his home in London in April. Photograph: Kin Cheung/AP

The ISC also suggested redactions on non-security grounds were “being applied far too broadly”, and accused the government of withholding documents despite not having “the authority to do so”.

The committee said it did not think the motion passed by the Commons demanding documents related to the appointment allowed redactions “other than on grounds of prejudice to UK national security and international relations”.

In particular, the committee said the government had withheld a vetting file compiled by UK Security Vetting (UKSV). In April, it was revealed that UKSV had recommended against granting Mandelson the developed vetting necessary for his appointment, but the Foreign Office had given him clearance despite that advice.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *